Words cannot be unread – but I sometimes wish they could.

Posted on September 12, 2013. Filed under: All, Education, life |

The proof is not in the pudding, the proof of the pudding is in the eating.

One does not “go direct”. Go to gaol. Go directly to gaol. Do not pass Go. Do not collect £200. Take the direct route if you wish, but go directly.

Mr. Clarkson, if something is 4 times greater than 1, it is 5, not 4.

I of haveten thought that Terry Pratchett’s least useful contribution to the literary word lies in the abuse have “of”.

There is too much loose use of “loose”. I fear we may lose the correct meaning.

Little Johnny went to the shops and brought some pies. I wonder if he bought them or was taking them there to sell ?

Clothes may be made of cloths.

They’re, there, their. It’s all better now.

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

2 Responses to “Words cannot be unread – but I sometimes wish they could.”

RSS Feed for Forensically sound(ing off) Comments RSS Feed

Generally yes (and some of them make my flesh creep), though ‘go direct’ is a touch more contentious.

I recently saw a blog post about this (via Michael Rosen’s Facebook feed), in connection with the proposed new grammar tests. There are lots of places where the use of the adverb form -ly is looser, as in, “Tyger, tyger, burning bright”. That’s not to say that I wouldn’t prefer ‘go directly’ in most case; it’s just that sometimes there might be a little more wriggle room. Even that font of knowledge, Fowler, wasn’t averse to bending the rule where elegance and flow were best served.

In order to choose to ignore a “rule”, one should first understand that rule and its normal application. A test is not about what is common accepted, it is about demonstrating understanding of something whether one agrees with it or not. (see what I did there ? )

I saw the blog post – IMNSHO, the problem could have been resolved by the addition of a single comma.


Where's The Comment Form?

    About

    This is the weblog of Angus M. Marshall, forensic scientist, author of Digital Forensics : digital evidence in criminal investigations and MD at n-gate ltd.

    RSS

    Subscribe Via RSS

    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    • Subscribe in Google Reader
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • The latest comments to all posts in RSS

    Meta

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: